| | Further news on deplorable election tactics with BNP and UKIP candidates both taking aim at Muslims and Islam in a desperate bid for votes.
|
The Western Mail reports that BNP candidate in the Welsh Assembly elections, Susan Harwood, has “display[ed] highly offensive material that advocates violence against members of a Muslim organisation on her Facebook site.” From the Western Mail:
“Politicians from mainstream parties have condemned Susan Harwood, a BNP candidate in Torfaen at next week’s National Assembly election.
“The material, which uses abusive four-letter language about a group called Muslims Against Crusades, was featured on Ms Harwood’s Facebook site, but has since been removed.
“Labour’s Lynne Neagle, who has represented the seat since the Assembly was formed and is seeking re-election, said: “This is outrageous behaviour by someone who pretends to be a respectable candidate in a democratic election. It’s one thing to oppose an organisation’s views, but her actions go far beyond legitimate criticism.
““It is totally unacceptable that BNP candidates continue to behave like this. People across Wales should know that a vote for the BNP is a vote for thugs and racists of the worst sort. If the BNP had a shred of decency, they would drop Susan Harwood as a candidate.””
The BNP has already been referred to the Electoral Commission over leaflets distributed in Scotland which falsely claimed that there are “more Muslims in the UK than Scots.”
And the Leicester Mercury reports that UKIP candidate for the Leicester South by-election, Abhijit Pandya, wrote a blog article calling Islam "morally flawed and degenerate."
From the Leicester Mercury:
"The UKIP candidate for the Leicester South by-election has caused outrage by condemning Islam on his blog.
"In the article, Abhijit Pandya called Islam "morally flawed and degenerate" and said he backed a controversial Dutch politician, who called Islam a retarded ideology.
"“In his blog, Mr Pandya wrote: "Campaigning in Leicester recently, I have been shocked to discover the quanta of those from Islamic backgrounds on one form of a benefit or another.
“"Islamic culture inherently rejects the Western way of life, more specifically the Protestant work ethic that has successfully built the economies of the West. The increase of Islam in the UK is going to be a problem for the welfare state.
""A removal of multi-culturalism and assimilation of these people needs to done to save them from the abyss of exclusion and welfare. Above all, one should not shy away of contemplating forced repatriation, or threatening it to further assimilation, as a result of their lack of economic contribution to the UK."
"He added: "A system that treats women as slaves without chains is morally flawed and degenerate.
""Why should Britain, the country that fathered the modern world, put up with this – as (controversial Dutch politician Geert) Wilder's put it – 'retarded ideology'."
It is important that the Electoral Commission properly investigate the speech and behaviour by electoral candidates for possible infraction of our anti-discrimination and incitement to racial and religious hatred laws.
Though of course the greater burden of proof required to prosecute cases of incitement to religious hatred compared to racial hatred leaves Muslims more vulnerable to the practice with lesser protection under the law. UPDATE: The Leicester Mercury's editorial this week: "Leicester South hopeful Abhijit Pandya has said the anti-Islamic diatribe published on his blog was an attempt to highlight issues regarding integration and employment "which we should not shy away from discussing."
"Really? To us it seemed like a wildly inflammatory rant which boiled down to a crass and nasty characterisation of Muslims as lazy, intolerant spongers who are a threat to the British way of life. It was not part of a reasoned debate about multiculturalism, but a series of sweeping, unsubstantiated generalisations which demonise the Muslim community."
|