| | Melanie Phillips (pictured) explains the BNP’s popularity in her Spectator blog as being the result of ‘the threat from Islamic supremacism and the concern of the disenfranchised white voters that the political establishment is supinely going along with the progressive Islamisation of Britain’.
|
‘All around them they see the establishment responding to Islamist bullying with acts of appeasement. Jihadis parade on the streets threatening to behead infidels — but it is white objectors whose collars are felt by the police. The mainstream political parties are all petrified of saying anything about either the steady encroachment of Islam into Britain’s public space or the linked phenomenon of mass immigration. […]
‘So the BNP has been handed an extraordinary electoral advantage: it can tell voters that it is the only party prepared unequivocally to denounce such things. The rise of Nick Griffin is intimately related to the unchecked march of Islamism in Britain. The BNP is, in one sense, merely the other side of the jihadi coin.’
The remarks are highly derogatory in presenting Muslim lobbying for equality under the law, for example in establishing Muslim faith schools, analogous to the existence of Christian, Jewish, Sikh and Hindu schools, or the extension of racial hatred laws to cover anti-Muslim prejudice, as ‘Islamist bullying’, ‘appeasement’ and the ‘unchecked march of Islamism in Britain’. Phillips also uses the actions of an extreme minority of Muslims (al-Muhajiroun), to suggest that the BNP’s attitude towards Muslims are to be appreciated as legitimate concerns.
Phillips plays the BNP’s own game in extending the repulsive behaviour of al-Muhajiroun to British Muslims in general, thereby justifying the BNP’s obnoxious attitudes.
British Muslims have categorically and consistently distanced themselves from the actions of fringe groups that delight in sparking controversy with their outlandish claims and basking in the subsequent media spotlight.
It is disgraceful that Phillips should seek to rationalize the BNP’s anti-Muslim prejudice by using the actions of a fringe group which British Muslims have overwhelmingly rejected, or in suggesting that equality under the law for Muslims represents 'the steady encroachment of Islam into Britain’s public space'. What does Phillips suggest we do to address the concerns of those driven into the arms of the BNP?
She writes:
‘This is why all decent people must join in the fight against Islamic supremacism. Support for the BNP would plummet if the political mainstream were to limit immigration, denounce cultural Islamic imperialism and refuse to give one inch to sharia law, saying no to polygamy, sharia finance, sharia courts and all attempts to set up a parallel Islamic society in Britain.’
No mention here of the existence of the Jewish Beth Din courts which are regulated by the same legislative act that permits the right to arbitration through Shari’ah tribunals. Should these too be refused the right to operate?
And whither evidence of a parallel Islamic society in Britain? This recent report by Lancaster University suggests that far from leading parallel lives, British Muslims are better integrated than their European counterparts.
As commentary today dissects Nick Griffin appearance on BBC Question Time yesterday, it is shocking that Melanie Phillips should echo and cast as reasonable the party’s claim of a steady ‘Islamisation of Britain’. It is in the same vein as an earlier column by Leo McKinstry in the Daily Express and only serves to provide the racist BNP with a veneer of mainstream respectability.
|